In today's commercial business environment, effective negotiation demands the ability to regulate your emotions and the skill to build genuine trust when business relationships are interdependent. In a recent webinar for Cranfield alumni, Professor Javier Marcos explored ten powerful strategies for managing emotions and building trust in negotiations. These approaches can transform potentially contentious exchanges into productive partnerships.
Alumni who missed the session can , and don’t forget to where Professor Marcos will continue to explore advanced negotiation strategies and real-world case studies.
Strategies for managing emotions
1. Labelling emotions
Acknowledging emotions—both yours and your counterpart's—creates space for more rational discussion. Rather than ignoring tension, naming it reduces its power to derail negotiations. For instance, when negotiating with a supplier who appears frustrated with your proposed pricing structure, instead of becoming defensive, try saying: "It seems like you're feeling concerned about the margins in our proposal." This simple acknowledgement often diffuses tension and opens dialogue about the underlying issues.
2. Avoiding overreaction
Strategic negotiators sometimes deliberately provoke emotional responses to gain concessions. Recognising this tactic allows you to maintain composure. A potential client comments may say, "Your proposal is frankly insulting compared to what your competitors are offering." Instead of responding defensively, you could consider responding with a statement like, "I understand you're not satisfied with our current proposal. Let's set aside the characterisations and focus on which specific elements don't meet your expectations."
Avoiding overreaction requires recognising that negotiators sometimes deliberately use strong language or emotional displays to provoke responses that lead to concessions. The key is to respond to the substance rather than the emotional delivery, maintaining composure while redirecting the conversation to tangible issues. This disciplined approach prevents the escalation that often results in hasty, unfavourable concessions.
3. Assessing angry displays
Not all displays of emotion are genuine. Learning to distinguish between calculated anger and genuine frustration helps you respond appropriately. For instance, during contract renewal talks, your counterpart suddenly becomes visibly angry about a standard clause that was previously accepted without issue. Rather than immediately offering concessions, assess whether this represents a genuine concern or a negotiation tactic by asking specific questions about their objections.
Assessing angry displays involves determining whether the other party's emotion is genuine or a calculated tactic designed to gain concessions. Effective negotiators recognise that anger is most persuasive when directed at the task rather than the person, perceived as justified, and delivered in a context of relative independence. Understanding these dynamics helps you respond strategically rather than reactively to emotional displays.
4. Using assertiveness strategically
The five-part assertion framework provides a structured way to express concerns without triggering defensive reactions. The five-part assertion framework provides a structured way to express concerns without triggering defensive reactions by stating: what you like, what you don't like, what you want, what will happen if agreement is reached, and what will happen otherwise. Imagine you are negotiating delivery timelines with a manufacturing partner. Instead of simply demanding faster turnaround, use the framework: "What I like about our partnership is your attention to quality. What concerns me is the proposed eight-week delivery timeline. What I'd like is a six-week timeline. If we can agree to this, we can commit to a larger order. If not, we'll need to split our order between multiple suppliers."
This approach balances firmness with respectfulness, presenting your position clearly while maintaining a collaborative tone. It transforms potential confrontations into problem-solving conversations.
5. Using extended pauses
Silence is a powerful tool in negotiations. Strategic pauses give both parties time to reflect and often lead to better outcomes. Think about a situation where after presenting your proposal for a joint venture, the other party does not react. Resist the urge to fill any silence with additional concessions. Instead, remain comfortably quiet for 10-20 seconds, allowing your counterpart time to process the information and formulate a thoughtful response rather than a reactive one.
Extended pauses serve multiple strategic purposes in negotiations: after making an offer, after receiving a counteroffer, after asking an important question, and to encourage a deliberative mindset. These deliberate silences a few seconds reduce the conversation's pace, allowing deeper consideration of proposals and preventing reactive responses. They create space for reflection that often leads to more creative solutions.
Strategies for building trust
6. Establishing process transparency
Beginning negotiations with clarity about process creates psychological safety and sets expectations for all parties. When starting negotiations for a complex software implementation project for instance, you might say: "Today, I propose we first discuss our overarching goals, then identify our key requirements, explore potential solutions, and finally establish a framework for implementation. Does that approach work for you?" This transparency reduces uncertainty and builds immediate rapport.
Establishing process transparency involves building positive initial rapport and clearly outlining how the negotiation will proceed before substantive discussions begin. This approach creates psychological safety by reducing uncertainty about what will happen next and demonstrates respect for the other party's need for clarity. It sets the stage for productive exchanges by ensuring both parties share expectations about the negotiation's structure and goals.
7. Reciprocal information sharing
Opening up about priorities and constraints encourages similar disclosures from your counterpart, creating fertile ground for value creation. Think about a situation where in a real estate negotiation, you say: "While price is important to us, we're particularly concerned about closing date flexibility and the property's condition report." This disclosure often prompts the seller to reveal their own priorities, perhaps that speed matters more than maximising the final price, creating opportunity for mutually beneficial terms.
8. Highlighting shared interests
Identifying common ground helps frame the negotiation as a collaborative problem-solving exercise rather than a competition. The historic Camp David Accords between Egypt and Israel illustrate this principle perfectly. When mediators discovered both sides had compatible interests—Egypt wanted sovereignty over the Sinai Peninsula while Israel needed security—they crafted an agreement for Egypt to reclaim the territory as a demilitarised zone, satisfying both parties' core needs.
Highlighting shared interests involves identifying where both parties' goals align or complement each other, even when they appear initially opposed. This strategy reframes the negotiation as a collaborative problem-solving exercise with compatible objectives rather than a competition. By focusing on these areas of potential agreement, negotiators can build momentum and goodwill that helps address more challenging issues.
9. Triggering reliability and consistency
Following through on commitments, even small ones, builds credibility that supports larger agreements. During prolonged negotiations for instance in a corporate merger, consistently providing promised information by agreed deadlines—even when the information might not be entirely favourable to your position—demonstrates trustworthiness that can sustain momentum through difficult discussion phases.
Triggering reliability and consistency requires being clear and upfront about your position and intentions, then meticulously following through on any promises or agreements made. This behavioural consistency builds predictability that allows the other party to engage more confidently in the negotiation process. It creates a positive cycle where reliability begets reliability, steadily increasing the level of trust between parties.
10. Problem-solving jointly
Addressing core human concerns, such as those identified by Fisher and Shapiro, is the cornerstone of connecting to others. These concerns include appreciation (feeling valued), affiliation (connection to others), autonomy (freedom to make decisions), and status (recognition of standing). Addressing these creates conditions where collaborative problem-solving flourishes. For instance, when restructuring a long-term supplier relationship, acknowledging the supplier's industry expertise (status), expressing genuine appreciation for their past contributions, emphasising your continued partnership (affiliation), and giving them choices in how the new terms might be structured (autonomy) creates an environment where both parties can work together to find innovative solutions.
Applying these strategies in practice
These ten approaches are most effective when tailored to your specific negotiation context. In highly distributive (win-lose) negotiations, emotional management becomes crucial to prevent unfavourable concessions. In integrative (win-win) negotiations, trust-building strategies create opportunities to expand value for all parties.
Effective negotiation balances tactical skill with emotional intelligence and trust-building. The ten strategies outlined here provide a comprehensive framework for approaching even the most challenging negotiations.
Whether you're negotiating business contracts, resolving workplace conflicts, or engaging in high-stakes diplomatic discussions, these approaches can help transform potentially adversarial exchanges into productive partnerships that create sustainable value for all involved.
Remember that negotiation is fundamentally a human activity. By addressing both the emotional and substantive dimensions of your discussions, you can achieve better outcomes and stronger relationships that support future collaboration.
Ready to transform your negotiation outcomes?
The strategies outlined above represent just a glimpse of the comprehensive approach taught in the Cranfield Strategic Negotiation Programme. This immersive experience goes beyond theory, offering hands-on practice with professional behavioural experts in realistic scenarios that challenge and refine your skills. Our next programme runs from 30 September to 2 October 2025 and Cranfield alumni receive a 20% discount on course fees. Register or secure your place by emailing Cranfield Executive Development.
Additionally, by , you can:
- Access expert articles from our Knowledge Hub
- Gain insights from Cranfield’s cutting-edge research
- Receive exclusive invitations to events and networking opportunities
Cranfield alumni can also access articles on negotiation via their Alumni Library Online (ALO).
Negotiation webinar 2 - Building trust and managing emotions
EBSCO
Adair, W. L., & Brett, J. M. (2005). The negotiation dance: Time, culture, and behavioral sequences in negotiation. Organization Science, 16(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0102
Knutsen, D., & Le Bigot, L. (2018). The influence of conceptual (mis)match on collaborative referring in dialogue. Psychological Research, 84(2), 514–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1060-1
Proquest (ABI/INFORM Global)
Alves de Moura, J., & Costa, A. P. C. S. (2018). Personality Traits and Negotiation Style Effects on Negotiators’ Perceptions in a Web-Based Negotiation. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 30(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2018040101
Grace, R. (2020). The humanitarian as negotiator: Developing capacity across the aid sector. Negotiation Journal, 36(1), 13–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12307
Sharma, S., Agarwal, A., Agarwal, I., & Gupta, A. (2017). A cross-cultural examination on the role of emotional intelligence in predicting negotiation effectiveness. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 82(4), 20.
Want to know more from Professor Javier Marcos Cuevas’ research?
Visit to access his research in Cranfield’s repository CERES.
How to access your Alumni Library Online (ALO)
Follow these simple steps to access your ALO
- Go to your .
- Log in with your details.
- Scroll down the page and click on Alumni Library Online.
- Click on Databases or Useful Websites sections to find the resources listed above, and much more!
Forgotten your portal login?
Please email the Alumni Team.
Any other questions?
Contact your ALO team